The 2004 Election

The race is over. John Kerry has made the call to the President.

Despite what many will say, I personally do not believe the loss of the presidency is the start of the end of the world. I believe that things will progress, more or less, like they have for the last four years, which is to say in a direction I don’t like. But left-leaning extremist talk of Bush enacting a civilian draft and taking over Iran, North Korea and France are just as dumb as talk from the right-leaning extremists about how a Kerry win would have led to a terrorist attack thereafter.

What the democrats need to do is what the republicans are doing right now, and that’s sitting down and looking at where they lost and immediately planning for the 2006 and 2008 elections based on that.

Slate.com has a new piece that says

If you’re a Democrat, here’s my advice. Do what the Republicans did in 1998. Get simple. Find a compelling salesman and get him ready to run for president in 2008. Put aside your quibbles about preparation, stature, expertise, nuance, and all that other hyper-sophisticated garbage that caused you to nominate Kerry. You already have legions of people with preparation, stature, expertise, and nuance ready to staff the executive branch of the federal government. You don’t need one of them to be president. You just need somebody to win the White House and appoint them to his administration. And that will require all the simplicity, salesmanship, and easygoing humanity they don’t have.

I agree with that. If you look at many of the polling numbers “not Bush” beat Bush pretty handily, but Kerry only managed to tie with him. The democrats really suffered when they went with the most “vanilla” and “most likely to win” candidate in their primaries, rather than the one who was the strongest on the issues they wanted to advance.

The republicans on the other hand need to be mindful that even though they won the election, they still don’t have a clear mandate from the people. In fact, while the percentages aren’t all that different from 2000, the number of voters increased significantly, implying that we as a country are just as equally divided as before, but the strength behind each side of the division has increased.

So now, in many ways, we’ll get to see how Bush would have fared politically had September 11th never happened. He’s still got many of the problems he walked into four years ago before the attacks, like a a weak economy and rising job losses, to face.

Four more years, indeed.

Do you feel safer?

From Yahoo News:

So far as she knows, Pufferbelly Toys owner Stephanie Cox hasn’t been passing any state secrets to sinister foreign governments, or violating obscure clauses in the Patriot Act.

So she was taken aback by a mysterious phone call from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to her small store in this quiet Columbia River town just north of Portland.

“I was shaking in my shoes,” Cox said of the September phone call. “My first thought was the government can shut your business down on a whim, in my opinion. If I’m closed even for a day that would cause undue stress.”

When the two agents arrived at the store, the lead agent asked Cox whether she carried a toy called the Magic Cube, which he said was an illegal copy of the Rubik’s Cube, one of the most popular toys of all time.

He told her to remove the Magic Cube from her shelves, and he watched to make sure she complied.

After the agents left, Cox called the manufacturer of the Magic Cube, the Toysmith Group, which is based in Auburn, Wash. A representative told her that Rubik’s Cube patent had expired, and the Magic Cube did not infringe on the rival toy’s trademark.

Virginia Kice, a spokeswoman for Immigration and Customs Enforcement, said agents went to Pufferbelly based on a trademark infringement complaint filed in the agency’s intellectual property rights center in Washington, D.C.

I’d love to hear the justification given for the Department of Homeland Security having an “intellectual property rights center” and why money, time and manpower should be spent tracking down toys that break patents that have already expired some time ago.

Once again, terror is used to justify stupid actions by the government.

Alan Keys is insane

From the Chicago Sun-Times:

U.S. Senate candidate Alan Keyes told a rally Saturday that incest was “inevitable” for children raised by gay couples because the children might not know both biological parents.

“If we do not know who the mother is, who the father is, without knowing all the brothers and sisters, incest becomes inevitable,” Keyes told the Marquette Park rally held to oppose same-sex marriages.

“Whether they mean it or not, that is what will happen. If you are masked from your knowing your biological parents, you are in danger of encountering brothers and sisters you have no knowledge of.”

Across a road in the park, about 40 gay-rights proponents jeered. One said the frequently controversial Keyes, a Republican running against Democratic state Sen. Barack Obama, was trying to stir up voters.

Of course, candidate Keyes forgets that this would mean that children raised by heterosexual adoptive couples would also be at risk, so we should ban that as well.

USA Today highlighted the difference between the Obama and Keyes campaigns:

Barack Obama hobnobbed with comic Robin Williams and musician Stevie Wonder at the home of Playboy CEO Christie Hefner during a $2,500-a-plate fundraiser catered by Wolfgang Puck.

Alan Keyes crashed the New Trier Township Republican dinner after organizers refused to invite him to speak.

Jon Stewart vs. Crossfire

video link (36MB, .wmv format)

The Daily Show’s host completely rips into both sides of political talk show punditry, and continues to prove that a comedy show based around fake news turns out to be the best source for real journalism in today’s media.

If you agree with what Stewart says during his appearance, I encourage you to leave feedback on Crossfire’s website saying so.